<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PayPerPost introduce &#8216;no-follow&#8217; links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smemon.com/payperpost-introduce-no-follow-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smemon.com/payperpost-introduce-no-follow-links/</link>
	<description>Life of a Young Irish Internet Entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: smemon</title>
		<link>http://www.smemon.com/payperpost-introduce-no-follow-links/comment-page-1/#comment-6314</link>
		<dc:creator>smemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smemon.com/payperpost-introduce-no-follow-links/#comment-6314</guid>
		<description>no, and i&#039;m sick of arguing this  :mrgreen: 

the &#039;paid link haters&#039; think people just buy paid reviews purely for SEO benefits, but that&#039;s a very naive view, as imo, the majority of advertisers just want the buzz around the blogosphere first and foremost - yeah the SEO benefits were a nice sweetener, but not essential.

if advertisers demand a &#039;follow&#039; link, they will now be hurting themselves in terms of SEO, so i&#039;d imagine &#039;no follow&#039; will become the norm on paid reviews, unless of course Google change their rules again. 

hopefully for us bloggers, we&#039;ll regain some sort of credit with google as a result of this, as we haven&#039;t just sold up and stopped blogging - something google had suggested by basically saying paid links were a rich man&#039;s spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, and i&#8217;m sick of arguing this  <img src='http://www.smemon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>the &#8216;paid link haters&#8217; think people just buy paid reviews purely for SEO benefits, but that&#8217;s a very naive view, as imo, the majority of advertisers just want the buzz around the blogosphere first and foremost &#8211; yeah the SEO benefits were a nice sweetener, but not essential.</p>
<p>if advertisers demand a &#8216;follow&#8217; link, they will now be hurting themselves in terms of SEO, so i&#8217;d imagine &#8216;no follow&#8217; will become the norm on paid reviews, unless of course Google change their rules again. </p>
<p>hopefully for us bloggers, we&#8217;ll regain some sort of credit with google as a result of this, as we haven&#8217;t just sold up and stopped blogging &#8211; something google had suggested by basically saying paid links were a rich man&#8217;s spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirjorge</title>
		<link>http://www.smemon.com/payperpost-introduce-no-follow-links/comment-page-1/#comment-6313</link>
		<dc:creator>sirjorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smemon.com/payperpost-introduce-no-follow-links/#comment-6313</guid>
		<description>but isn&#039;t the purpose of buying links to get the follow tag?

seems a bit odd, I&#039;ll keep on eye on these developments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but isn&#8217;t the purpose of buying links to get the follow tag?</p>
<p>seems a bit odd, I&#8217;ll keep on eye on these developments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/11 queries in 0.079 seconds using disk

Served from: www.smemon.com @ 2010-09-09 14:13:24 -->